{"id":526,"date":"2013-06-17T10:00:25","date_gmt":"2013-06-17T15:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/?p=526"},"modified":"2014-05-01T12:00:48","modified_gmt":"2014-05-01T17:00:48","slug":"pdfs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/pdfs\/","title":{"rendered":"PDFs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Public Space and the Geography of the Modern City<\/strong><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"> Peter G. Goheen<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><\/em><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> Public space is often seen as problem space in the modern city: it is now as it has always\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">been a space of contention. It is the visible and accessible venue wherein the public \u00b1 comprising\u00a0<\/span>institutions and citizens acting in concert \u00b1 enact rituals and make claims designed to win\u00a0recognition. This article discusses two theses which regard the public realm in the modern city\u00a0from very different perspectives. It then seeks to understand the strikingly contrary conclusions\u00a0about the public sphere by exploring several of the issues which proponents of the two\u00a0<em id=\"__mceDel\"><em id=\"__mceDel\"><em id=\"__mceDel\"><em id=\"__mceDel\"><em id=\"__mceDel\">viewpoints interpret differently.<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Key words: public space, public symbols, rituals, modern city.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Public space and the geography of the modern city\" href=\"http:\/\/studiereis.fondsbkvb.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/Goheen-Peter-G-Public-space-and-the-geography-of-the-modern-city.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Link and\/or\u00a0Download PDF<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><em id=\"__mceDel\">Eugene\u2019s Exclusion Ordinance:\u00a0<\/em><em id=\"__mceDel\">A Dilemma for Civil Liberties, Public Space,\u00a0<\/em><em id=\"__mceDel\">and the Homeless<\/em><\/strong><br \/>\n<em><em id=\"__mceDel\">Heather Marek<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">Abstract:<\/strong><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0This paper uses interviews with community members, case law, police data, local\u00a0newspapers and broadcasts, and other literature to examine some of the conundrums that arise \u00a0for the City of Eugene in enacting the Exclusion Ordinance. It includes an extensive analysis of\u00a0the constitutional issues surrounding the ordinance, as well as legal precedent. This paper looks \u00a0at how exclusion represents the community\u2018s conceptualization and use of law enforcement and \u00a0public spaces, and how this ordinance is part of the systemic privatization of the commons. \u00a0Finally, it explores how exclusion and other laws impact vulnerable members of the community. \u00a0The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the issues the Exclusion Ordinance poses to civil \u00a0liberties and human rights, through the lens of an activist. The analysis primarily focuses on the \u00a0perspective of the homeless and youth populations, as these are often underrepresented in policy\u00a0decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Eugene\u2019s Exclusion Ordinance\" href=\"http:\/\/cldc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Marek-Exclusion-Zone-Project.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Link and\/or\u00a0Download PDF<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em id=\"__mceDel\" style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong><em id=\"__mceDel\">\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">Public Space and the Geography of the Modern City Peter G. Goheen Abstract: Public space is often seen as problem space in the modern city: it is now as it has always\u00a0been a space of contention. It is the visible and accessible venue wherein the public \u00b1 comprising\u00a0institutions and citizens acting in concert \u00b1 enact rituals and make claims designed&hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"btn btn-default\" href=\"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/pdfs\/\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pdfs","category-st-henri-2"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s3Bp5m-pdfs","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naccarato.org\/sthenri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}